Getty Images
Rachel Reeves claims the Tories masked the true state of UK public finances then "ran away".
The chancellor is set to announce immediate cuts worth billions of pounds, aimed at plugging a £20bn black hole in the finances, when she addresses Parliament on Monday.
Rachel Reeves’ plans are expected to include the cancellation of some road and rail projects, a reduction in spending on external consultants and a drive to cut public sector waste.
She will accuse the previous government of “covering up" shortfalls in departmental budgets and then “running away”.
However the Conservative Party said the chancellor’s message was designed to “con the British public” so that she could raise taxes.
A Treasury internal audit of the public finances will be published on Monday, and is expected to show a gap of around £20bn between tax revenues coming in and expected spending.
The chancellor will tell Parliament that this requires “immediate action” to restore economic stability and “fix the foundations of our economy”.
Projects that could be paused or cancelled include: the road tunnel under Stonehenge, Boris Johnson’s New Hospital programme and the Euston section of HS2.
Before the election, leading economists warned that the sums did not add up and that the new government would face a stark choice between raising taxes, cutting spending or abandoning its commitments to reduce debt in the medium term.
But the incoming government has said it found the situation was even worse than it expected, describing it as "catastrophic", with extra demands on the government purse being uncovered as new ministers went through their departments’ accounts with a fine-tooth comb.
Ms Reeves is said to be “genuinely shocked” by some of the findings.
However, she will not suggest at this stage that tax rises will be required.
Instead she will invite the Office for Budget Responsibility to make an assessment of the public finances. She will also kick off the process for a Spending Review, which looks at departmental budgets over the longer term.
Budgets or similar fiscal events will be held only once a year, with Ms Reeves expected to set a date for her first in the autumn.
Insiders suggest that had the chancellor wanted to raise taxes, she would have held an emergency Budget this week, but that instead she will restate manifesto commitments to not raise the rates of personal taxes, including income tax.
Getty Images
The tunnel under Stonehenge is one of the infrastructure projects that could be halted to save money
Ms Reeves is also expected to announce that some public sector workers will be given pay rises in line with the recommendations of the independent pay review bodies. This would mean above-inflation settlements for teachers, members of the armed forces and prison staff, among others, but would mean finding the money to pay for that too.
The chancellor is said to believe that the cost of funding the deals should be weighed against the cost of the disruption to the economy from strikes and the cost of failing to recruit and retain staff.
The chancellor will also announce a new “Office of Value for Money” aimed at identifying and recommending savings, including in the current financial year, so “poor value spending is cut off before it begins”.
Last week, Home Secretary Yvette Cooper said the Conservatives' plan to remove asylum seekers to Rwanda had cost tax payers £700m, nearly double the price tag previously in the public domain.
Other departments have identified spending needs not covered by current budget plans. On Sunday, Environment Secretary Steve Reed said his department had found the condition of flood defences to be “far worse than we were led to believe”.
The Conservative Party said the state of the public finances was clear before the election.
Former Tory chancellor Jeremy Hunt accused the new government of "peddling nonsense". The books were "wide open and what they show is a healthy, growing economy”, he said.
Gareth Davies, shadow exchequer secretary to the Treasury, said: "[Ms Reeves'] words and actions on supposedly saving the taxpayer money are an insult when she is secretly planning to raise their taxes at the same time.”