Justin Baldoni chose not to refile lawsuit, his lawyer says

4 hours ago 16

Ian YoungsCulture reporter

Reuters Justin Baldoni in a pink jacket, smiling and posing at the It Ends With Us premiere in 2024 in front of a dark background showing part of the film's title in giant pink lettersReuters

Justin Baldoni directed and starred in It Ends With Us, based on the Colleen Hoover novel

Justin Baldoni's lawyer has said the US actor chose not to refile his $400m (£295m) lawsuit against his former co-star Blake Lively after it was dismissed by a judge, in order to retain the right to lodge an appeal.

After Baldoni's case was dismissed in June, his lawyer suggested he would file an amended complaint, but that did not happen.

Last month, the judge entered a "final judgment" in the case, effectively ending it unless there is an appeal.

In a statement, Baldoni's lawyer Bryan Freedman said: "At this point, we have to set the record straight: no deadlines were missed. Our clients chose not to amend their complaint to preserve appeal rights."

Reuters Ryan Reynolds and Blake Lively posing together at a film premiere, with various logos on a black backdrop behind themReuters

Baldoni also named Lively's husband Ryan Reynolds in his lawsuit

Baldoni and Lively, who starred in the 2024 film It Ends with Us, have been locked in a bitter legal battle since Lively sued Baldoni last December accusing him of sexual harassment and waging a smear campaign against her.

In response, he filed a lawsuit against her as well as her husband Ryan Reynolds, their publicist and the New York Times, claiming civil extortion, defamation and invasion of privacy.

Lively's lawsuit against Baldoni is ongoing, with a trial scheduled to start in March.

Mr Freedman's statement added: "In the meantime, we are focusing on Ms Lively's claims. We remain fully committed to pursuing the truth through every legal and factual avenue available and look forward to our day in court."

He also said the "truth regarding this case continues to be completely distorted in the media" in relation to the latest ruling, and that "even something as simple as a procedural update has resulted in a total mischaracterization".


Read Entire Article